Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd
Primary
AU
Registration not shown
← Broker directory
1 entity
unverified
Broker profile
FO
Forex Capital Trading Review: Is It Legit and Regulated?
Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd
AU
Operating period unverified
AKA Forex CT
FindMyFX score
critical risk0.5/10
0
Score out of 10
10
Independent assessment
Updated 2026-08-03
Contact & regulation
- Official website
- Not verified
- Address
- Not verified
- Contact
- Not verified
- Primary license
- ASIC · Unverified
Missing values mean the information has not been verified or published yet—not that the broker does not provide it.
Quick verdict
Is Forex Capital Trading legit and regulated?
FindMyFX has license records for Forex Capital Trading, but none is currently presented as fully verified. Check each entity, jurisdiction, source, and verification date before depositing.
This is a source-limited research summary, not a safety guarantee or investment recommendation.
Broker-provided profile information is reviewed before publication. Paid profile features never affect FindMyFX scores, license verification, risk flags, reviews, complaints, or editorial decisions.
Broker-provided company information
Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd, also called Forex CT, offered CFDs and margin foreign exchange contracts in Australia. ASIC cancelled its Australian financial services licence after an investigation.
Professional broker overview
FindMyFX editorial summary
Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd was an Australian retail OTC derivatives issuer that offered CFDs and margin-FX contracts. ASIC cancelled AFS licence 306400 and allowed it to continue only until 31 July 2020 for dispute resolution and orderly closure of existing positions, with no new positions permitted. Current trading conditions and operating contact details were not established from the reviewed source.
Prepared from reviewed sources for informational purposes. This is not investment advice.
Editorial note: The reviewed evidence is an ASIC enforcement release from 2020; current corporate status was not separately checked in a corporate registry.
- Operational status
- inactive
- Broker type
- unknown
- Execution model
- Not verified
- Support hours
- Not verified
Documented advantages
Documented limitations
- ASIC cancelled AFS licence 306400.
- ASIC said the firm was not permitted to open new client positions during the wind-down period.
75%coverage
Published profile coverage
6 of 8 core information groups currently contain published data. This measures data availability, not broker quality or safety.
Company structure
Legal entities
Registered companies associated with this broker profile.
Markets and instruments
Contracts for difference
unverified
Margin foreign exchange contracts
unverified
Research sources
Licenses and regulators
ASIC
306400
Last verified: Not shown
Type: Australian financial services licence
Client class: retail
Compensation: Not shown
Segregated funds: Unknown
Negative balance protection: Unknown
Risk flags
ASIC cancelled AFS licence 306400
critical · draftASIC cancelled the licence after findings involving conduct, conflicts, training and compliance, and prohibited new client positions during the wind-down period.
Score components
Regulation and licenses
0.0/10 · 35%ASIC cancelled the firm’s Australian financial services licence.
Security and track record
0.0/10 · 20%ASIC documented serious conduct and compliance findings and restricted activity to wind-down.
Trading conditions
0.0/10 · 15%Current account terms were not established and the firm was not permitted to open new positions during wind-down.
Company transparency
5.0/10 · 10%ASIC provides a clear legal identity, licence number, product scope and enforcement chronology.
Service quality
0.0/10 · 10%No current service operation or verified service-quality evidence was established.
Verified user reviews
0.0/10 · 10%No inspectable verified user-review dataset was identified in the reviewed official sources.
Profile update history
Broker profile was published.
2026-08-03
Related regulated broker profiles
These profiles share at least one recorded regulator. This is not a recommendation or equivalence claim.