FindMyFX
← Broker directory

Broker profile

TR

Triton Forex Markets Review: Is It Legit and Regulated?

Legal company not verified

Region unverified Operating period unverified

FindMyFX score

critical risk

0.3/10

0 Score out of 10 10
Independent assessment Updated 2026-08-07

Contact & regulation

Address
Not verified
Contact
152-160 City Road, London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2NX
Primary license
FCA · Unverified

Missing values mean the information has not been verified or published yet—not that the broker does not provide it.

Quick verdict

Is Triton Forex Markets legit and regulated?

FindMyFX has license records for Triton Forex Markets, but none is currently presented as fully verified. Check each entity, jurisdiction, source, and verification date before depositing.

This is a source-limited research summary, not a safety guarantee or investment recommendation.

Broker-provided profile information is reviewed before publication. Paid profile features never affect FindMyFX scores, license verification, risk flags, reviews, complaints, or editorial decisions.

Broker-provided company information

Triton Forex Markets appears on the UK FCA Warning List. The FCA states that the firm is not authorised and may be targeting people in the UK.

Professional broker overview

FindMyFX editorial summary

The FCA published a warning on Triton Forex Markets on 5 March 2026 and identifies tritonforex-innovationmarket.net as the website. The FCA states that the firm is not authorised by it and notes that customers would not have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or FSCS protection for dealings with this firm. Detailed trading conditions were not populated because an inspectable official broker page was not established in this review.

Prepared from reviewed sources for informational purposes. This is not investment advice.

Editorial note: The FCA cautions that unauthorised firms may provide incorrect or borrowed contact details. For that reason, the London address shown in the warning is recorded only as a contact, not as verified headquarters or legal-company data.

Operational status
warning
Broker type
unknown
Execution model
Not verified
Support hours
Not verified

Documented advantages

    Documented limitations

    • The FCA states that Triton Forex Markets is not authorised by it.
    • The FCA states that dealings with this firm would not have Financial Ombudsman Service or FSCS protection.
    75%coverage

    Published profile coverage

    6 of 8 core information groups currently contain published data. This measures data availability, not broker quality or safety.

    Licenses and regulators

    FCA

    No license number

    unverified

    Last verified: Not shown

    Type: Not shown
    Client class: Not shown
    Compensation: Not shown
    Segregated funds: Unknown
    Negative balance protection: Unknown

    Risk flags

    FCA warning for unauthorised firm

    high · draft

    The FCA states that Triton Forex Markets is not authorised and may be providing or promoting financial services without permission.

    Score components

    Regulation and licenses

    0.0/10 · 35%

    No FCA authorisation was verified; the FCA warning states the firm is unauthorised.

    Security and track record

    0.0/10 · 20%

    The authoritative evidence reviewed is an FCA warning, with no positive verified track-record evidence.

    Trading conditions

    0.0/10 · 15%

    No inspectable official broker source was established for current trading conditions.

    Company transparency

    2.5/10 · 10%

    The FCA supplies a name, website and reported address, but warns that such contact details may be incorrect or borrowed.

    Service quality

    0.0/10 · 10%

    No verified service-quality data was available in the reviewed sources.

    Verified user reviews

    0.0/10 · 10%

    No verified user-review data was found in the reviewed inspectable sources.

    Profile update history

    Broker profile was published.

    2026-08-07

    Related regulated broker profiles

    These profiles share at least one recorded regulator. This is not a recommendation or equivalence claim.